Look up the 2023 Report on WTO Compliance of the United States, to give the first example to come to mind.
The Report compiles some of the ways in which the US violates international trade law, whether it was by "undermining multilateral trading rules, imposing unilateral sanctions, manipulating double standards in industrial policies, and disturbing global industrial and supply chains" or in general "taking unilateral measures against other members under the guise of so-called 'national security,' 'human rights' and 'forced technology transfer'" and "coercing others into abiding by its diplomatic policies and illegitimate demands".
Not all ways in which the capitalist class becomes a full fledge capitalist class, with full ownership of assets, etc. are necessarily "lawful"... And for some, maybe it is just a reckonign.
Look up the 2023 Report on WTO Compliance of the United States, to give the first example to come to mind.
The Report compiles some of the ways in which the US violates international trade law, whether it was by "undermining multilateral trading rules, imposing unilateral sanctions, manipulating double standards in industrial policies, and disturbing global industrial and supply chains" or in general "taking unilateral measures against other members under the guise of so-called 'national security,' 'human rights' and 'forced technology transfer'" and "coercing others into abiding by its diplomatic policies and illegitimate demands".
Without conceding the point, your argument appears to be thst if done under color of law then thst makes it okay!
Anyway, Young Hunter is still running loose, so there is thst.
I said nothing about China, only that property rights in the US are a joke.
Not all ways in which the capitalist class becomes a full fledge capitalist class, with full ownership of assets, etc. are necessarily "lawful"... And for some, maybe it is just a reckonign.