Biden laptop has been reported? Huge Ukraine deaths (I do mean 1m, not the 30k zelensky mentioned which "experts say might be understated)? Of course you find 1m deaths unconvincing - you take what you read as being true. But it is factual. So what happens when you find out the reality? Don't kid yourself there is a single journalist who…
Biden laptop has been reported? Huge Ukraine deaths (I do mean 1m, not the 30k zelensky mentioned which "experts say might be understated)? Of course you find 1m deaths unconvincing - you take what you read as being true. But it is factual. So what happens when you find out the reality? Don't kid yourself there is a single journalist who has visited Ukraine and does not know the truth and has not seen the graveyards.
Take Lockdown fever. We all know Lockdowns were wrong because every politician in every country has since cliamed to have done their best to limit them (Lockdowns is a simple story, unlike vaccines). But most scientists knew that in advance and the officials were briefed so in advance. Why did no media challenge lockdowns as Jay Bhatcharya and other scientists did?
Of take Afghanistan withdrawal. There was no shortage of alternative commentators pointing out that US grip on Afghanistan had collapsed long before 2021 and that the exit would be a nightmare (many of these commentators had been regular mainstream media guests in 1990s but ditched after the Iraq/Afghanistan invasion - they rant about US in Ukraine and Gaza today). Why was that plain lie given so much time in the media .
And in both cases why has there been no subsequent investigation into the truth?
Or Russiagate which turned out to be wholly fake (but barely admitted to now).
Or the Biden laptop which was wholly genuine.
You don't see these as lies - all I can say is that the suspicion of ordinary voters serves them much better than your judgement serves you.
Biden laptop has been reported? Huge Ukraine deaths (I do mean 1m, not the 30k zelensky mentioned which "experts say might be understated)? Of course you find 1m deaths unconvincing - you take what you read as being true. But it is factual. So what happens when you find out the reality? Don't kid yourself there is a single journalist who has visited Ukraine and does not know the truth and has not seen the graveyards.
Take Lockdown fever. We all know Lockdowns were wrong because every politician in every country has since cliamed to have done their best to limit them (Lockdowns is a simple story, unlike vaccines). But most scientists knew that in advance and the officials were briefed so in advance. Why did no media challenge lockdowns as Jay Bhatcharya and other scientists did?
Of take Afghanistan withdrawal. There was no shortage of alternative commentators pointing out that US grip on Afghanistan had collapsed long before 2021 and that the exit would be a nightmare (many of these commentators had been regular mainstream media guests in 1990s but ditched after the Iraq/Afghanistan invasion - they rant about US in Ukraine and Gaza today). Why was that plain lie given so much time in the media .
And in both cases why has there been no subsequent investigation into the truth?
Or Russiagate which turned out to be wholly fake (but barely admitted to now).
Or the Biden laptop which was wholly genuine.
You don't see these as lies - all I can say is that the suspicion of ordinary voters serves them much better than your judgement serves you.
There's no point in going on with this, but almost all of what you say is spin of dubious origins.