Two-nanometer chips, Chechen yoghurt, low-carbon technology trade & the history of ordoliberalism
Great links, images and reading from Chartbook Newsletter
Rabbi with Torah, 1999, oil on canvas by Hyman Bloom, collection of the artist. Born to working class, religious Jews in Latvia in 1913, Bloom hoped to be a Rabbi. At seven, he arrived in Boston with his father and two of his brothers. Exhibited alongside Jackson Pollock and Picasso, he frequently painted rabbis as well as mutilated bodies — twin images of Jewish life in Eastern Europe — while also developing that 1960s American interest in Eastern forms of Mysticism, including sketches produced while on LSD. That synthesis of the rich aesthetics of his European past and American present is well captured in this essay by Susan Saccoccia.
Thank you for reading Chartbook. This is the free version of Top Links. To get the full Top Links feed with lots more material and analysis, please click here:
The next technological revolution
Any company that opens up a technological lead in the next generation of advanced semiconductors will be well placed to dominate an industry that pulled in well over $500bn in global chip sales last year. That is projected to grow further due to a surge in demand for the data centre chips that power generative AI services. TSMC, which dominates the global market in processors, has already shown the process test results for its “N2” — or 2 nanometre — prototypes to some of its biggest customers, including Apple and Nvidia, according to two people with direct knowledge of the discussions. But two people close to Samsung said the Korean chipmaker was offering cut-price versions of its latest 2 nanometre prototypes in an effort to attract the interest of big-name customers including Nvidia. “Samsung sees 2 nanometre as a game-changer,” said James Lim, analyst at US hedge fund Dalton Investments. “But people are still doubtful it can execute the migration better than TSMC.”
Source: FT
Political capitalism
What happens when Chechen warlords get their hands on a major French dairy company? Not much changes, it turns out — take from that what you will!
When a group of Chechens with links to their region’s strongman leader Ramzan Kadyrov showed up this summer to seize control of Danone’s operations in Russia, the company began receiving frightened calls from its staff in the country. The French dairy group had been close to finalising a Rothschild-brokered deal to leave Russia when the Kremlin declared its local operations, along with those of Danish brewer Carlsberg, had been placed under “temporary external management”. But while the designation sounded the death knell for Carlsberg’s role in its Russian business, two of whose top former executives now sit in prison, what has followed for Danone has been more of a bizarre stasis. Much of life at its Russian dairy operations continues as before, with the Chechens largely running the expropriated factories in name only and previous leadership still involved in much of the day-to-day management. Danone’s new Chechen bosses are “running it basically as an MBA case, fairly professional and without raising too many flags — pulling the guns out and stuff like that,” according to one person close to Russia’s government subcommittee on western assets. “It is extremely amicable,” the person said. Danone “are not telling the world they have been mistreated. They don’t sound like they are offended”.
Russia accounted for about 5 per cent of the group’s €27.6bn in annual revenues in 2022, making the French company among the most exposed of European consumer groups to the war. The yoghurt maker, Russia’s biggest dairy business, first entered the market three decades ago after the fall of the Soviet Union. As other western companies pulled out after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine last year, Danone initially said it would remain in Russia while halting investments, arguing that it had a responsibility to its 7,000 local employees and the dairy farmers who supplied its 13 factory sites.
Source: FT
Dear Reader,
Glad you are enjoying this Top Links. Chartbook Newsletter is fun to write. And I’m delighted it goes out for free to readers around the world. But it takes a lot of work! What sustains that effort are voluntary subscriptions from paying supporters. As a thank you, several times per week, paying supporters of Chartbook Newsletter receive an email like this, jam-packed with fascinating images, links and reading, as well as longer analytical essays. This free email is just some of that content. If you would like to receive the full Top Links in future, click here to join the supporters’ club:
Hyman Bloom, The Hull, 1952, Oil on canvas, Worcester Art Museum, Worcester, Massachusetts, Gift of the William H. Lane Foundation. © Stella Bloom Trust Courtesy, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston.
The green tech boom
Subscribers only.
Russian oil discounts
Subscribers only.
Hyman Bloom, Fish, Still Life, 1953, charcoal on paper (Photograph J.Cook)
Economic power
One central division between Right and Left might seem to be whether something called “the economy” is understood in capitalist societies as a space of consensual and mutually beneficial encounters (the free market Right), or a space of power relations (the Left). In fact, though, theories crucial to the production and reproduction of the existing social order have taken very seriously the role of power. We hear more about neoliberalism than ordoliberalism, and the former is often described as anti-statist, but to understand (say) the design of the contemporary European Union it helps to delve into German debates under the Nazis and beyond, where the state’s construction of a set of rules to enable private competition was the focus of the day. Raphael Fèvre’s book with Oxford University Press shows how important theories of power were to that moment:
Stefan Link’s review in the Journal of Modern History offers a very useful framing:
Hyman Bloom, Turban Squash, 1959, oil on canvas (Photograph J.Cook)