The provisional results of the German election are no surprise. The election was a devastating defeat for the parties of the Scholz coalition.
The SPD suffered its worst result in the history of the FRG. The Greens fell short of their previous high. The FDP will likely not make the 5 percent hurdle.
But it was not a decisive victory for the CDU. The CDU fell short of 30 percent. It was its second worst result in history.
All told, the parties of “old” Federal Republic are likely to score no more than 62 percent of the vote.
The three challengers all have strong roots in the former GDR. The AfD had a good night, but did not break decisively above 20 percent. The real surprise of the night was on the left. Wagenknecht’s movement will likely fall short of 5 percent. But Die Linke made a remarkable comeback, scoring 8.5 percent.
This fragmentation of party political spectrum, should not be confused with a “crisis of democracy”. As was already evident in the European elections this summer, German democracy is alive and kicking. Almost 84 percent turned out to vote, a huge surge relative to 2021.
The question is one of party programs and leadership.
It wasn’t a presidential-style choice. The CDU’s Merz is thought to be more competent than Scholz, but he has very little personal following beyond the CDU itself. Only a quarter of voters find Merz sympatico. But this was not an election in which voters were choosing between the leading candidates. The most popular politician in Germany - the SPD’s Defense Minister Boris Pistorius - wasn’t at the top of anyone’s ticket.
Translation: Top image: Would be a good Chancellor
Translation bottom: (Is up to the job of being Chancellor; Can lead through; Can be trusted; Is sympatico)
Source: Tagesschau
The election was about parties and coalitions. Germany needed a new government. The question was how to compose the new coalition.
The CDU has come out ahead and has recovered somewhat from the 2021 disaster, but is no doubt disappointed not to have broken decisively through 30 percent. Merz, who dallied with the AfD over the migration issue, is anathema to progressive Germans. But the CDU also hits a ceiling on the right. Amongst xenophobic German, memories are long and Angela Merkel and her open door policy of 2015 are blamed for the high number of refugees and asylum claimants.
Translation: Which party has most responsibility for …? (top: the current problems of the country; below: the large number of refugees and asylum seekers.)
Many Germans are concerned about the scale of migration. This is true for 89 percent of AfD voters and 70 percent of Merz’s CDU following. All told, migration is a concern for 55 percent of German voters. It was undoubtedly the most contentious issue of this election.
Translation: I am very concerned that too many foreigners come to Germany.
However, though Merz, the AfD and J.D. Vance want to focus all our attention on migration, the issue was only one amongst many topics at stake in this election. Even if we treat “internal security” and “migration” as the same topic, only one third of the German electorate nominate them as the decisive issues.
Translation: Which issue was most important in deciding your vote? Internal security; Social security; Migration; Economic growth; Environment and climate; Securing Peace; Price hikes.
Translation: The situation in Germany gives rise to confidence/concern.
If the data are to be believed, then this election was about a broader sense of malaise in Germany, not about the single issue of migration. Internal security, social security, migration, economic growth, climate and peace are all double-digit issues.
One issue that does not seem to have played a key role in the election was inflation.
If we use the AfD’s electorate as our barometer, it is true that they are very pessimistic about Germany’s economic situation.
And, at the personal level, AfD voters are most worried that prices are rising so fast that they cannot pay their bills (Top panel: 75%). They worry that they will face money problems in old age (Middle panel: 71%). AfD voters also worry that they will not be able to maintain their standard of living (Bottom panel: 74%).
The AfD scores most strongly amongst Germans whose economic situation is rated as “poor”.
But even if AfD voters are economically and socially stressed, inflation simply was not the key issue in this election. For AfD voters migration was six times more important and internal security five times more important.
Translation: Which topics was most important for your vote? Migration, internal security, economic growth, peace, price hikes.
If the election had been held in 2023, inflation might have been the decisive issue, . But team transitory has been vindicated. Inflation was a transient shock.
What matters now in Germany are not cyclical issues but structural questions. What are at stake are basic strategic issues. What the voters are putting in question is what, for want of better words, one must call the “social contract”.
More updates to follow tomorrow.
**
Thank you for reading Chartbook Newsletter. It is rewarding to write. I love sending it out for free to readers around the world. But it takes a lot of work. What sustains the effort are voluntary subscriptions from paying supporters. If you are enjoying the newsletter and would like to join the group of supporters, click here:
From looking at the election result we notice, that immiseration in Germany has progressed and that the country has been successfully transformed into a low trust society. And yes, if we look at eg., the Edelman Trust Barometer in 2021 still 53% had general trust in the countries institutions, a figure now reduced to 41%, which is below eg., Kenya, Mexico and Colombia. Countries with increasing poverty, social problems and decreasing trust vote "right". Left governments are usually the outcome of harmonious high trust societies, as they could be found in Scandinavia.
The Phoenix from the Ashes prize goes to the left, which rated just above 3% a few months ago and rose to indeed surprising 8.8%. Kudos goes to their leader Heidi Reichinnek who saved her mob with a few great speeches. Hers is the strongest party in the 18-29 age segment, which however is only 13.3% of the eligible voters, with probably a high degree of people with "migration background"; AfD his not far behind there. Bod Dylan got a Literature Nobel for his songs, maybe she gets one for her unpretentious rhetoric in parliament.
Loser of the Pack is Sarah Wagenknecht and the party named after her. Probably she diluted the party platform too much as to make it palatable to as many voters as possible. It also does not help, if you talk to people as if they were five-year olds. It also did not work for Dilma Rousseff in Brazil some years ago. 4.972% she got. I am to lazy to calculate how many votes 0.028% would have been.
The rest matters not really, as to find the effective differences between them require some intensive forensic research. They will continue to ignore the biggest problem all western economies are suffering: the the ever more intensively working "wealth pump" (Peter Turchin) from bottom to top. This eventually will kill off the western economies, if they are not already in an irrecoverable death spiral.
The big question is, will Merz (a former corporate takeover lawyer and BlackRock manager) kill off the coalition with SPD in a couple off years to do "the really necessary reforms", ie. radically culling social spending and the usual "cutting of red tape" and such, together with the AfD? Well possible.
Age structure of eligible German voters:
https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/1498/umfrage/altersstruktur-der-wahlberechtigten-bundestagswahl/
Reichinnek speeches:
https://youtu.be/l7bWsE_fMxI
https://youtu.be/omuYdl7NKfo
Thank you. This makes a lot of the general issues clear.